Posts tonen met het label sharepoint. Alle posts tonen
Posts tonen met het label sharepoint. Alle posts tonen

vrijdag 18 maart 2011

Microsoft positioneert Sharepoint nu ook als Enterprise search product

Microsoft is bezig met een opmars op het gebied van Enterprise Search en ze gebruiken Sharepoint als vervoermiddel.

Enterprise Search Resource Center | SharePoint 2010
Find overviews, how-to topics, and other resources to help you develop and deploy Enterprise Search solutions in SharePoint Server 2010

Het is bijzonder om te zien dat Sharepoint nu in één adem wordt genoemd met "Enterprise Search". Tot dit moment hebben de zoekoplossingen van Microsoft altijd een aparte plek gehad. Denk aan de Microsoft Search Server, Microsoft FAST Search Server etc. Sharepoint wordt zo echter wel een product dat bijna alles schijnt te zijn:
- CMS
- DMS
- Website
- Portaal
- zoekmachine
- samenwerkomgeving
- en wat nog meer?

bron: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/sharepoint/gg618546.aspx

donderdag 30 september 2010

Zoekfunctie in Sharepoint voldoet niet

Vandaag blijkt uit een bericht op fiercecontentmanagement dat gebruikers niet tevreden zijn met de zoekfuncties in Sharepoint.

Stephen Arnold haalt dit onderzoek aan in zijn weblog "Fierce critisism of Sharepoint".

Ik onderschrijf deze kritiek. Dit is nou juist waarom zowel Google als Autonomy gebruikers van Sharepoint zien als een potentiele klant. Het IDOL-platform én de Google Search Appliance hebben bewezen dat ze betere resultaten kunnen bereiken met het implementeren van een zoekoplossing op Sharepoint.

Sharepoint is (op dit moment) een goede oplossing voor content en (beperkt) document management. De zoekfunctie kan echter beter worden overgelaten aan andere, in search gespecialiseerde, zoekmachines.

dinsdag 1 december 2009

Google Wave and Microsoft Sharepoint... NOT alike

Today I read an article with the title "Can Google succeed outside of search?"

One piece of information got my attention a little bit more:

But Google keeps pushing: Its still-in-beta Google Wave promises to attack one of Microsoft's most beloved products, its SharePoint collaboration software.


To my knowlegde and experience with Google Wave, Wave is an online community platform and not so much a collaboration platform. Yes people can talk to each other, send messages, maybe even share a document through some link, but that is to simple to be compared with sharepoint.

The review of Google Wave vs. Microsoft Sharepoint on the Bamboo team blog makes the difference even clearer:

First of all, the question, "Is Google Wave a SharePoint Killer" is a completely artificial, nonsense argument dreamed up by either the Google PR team and/or the media to generate buzz. Wave is an email client (very tempted to say "consumer email client")... an exciting and innovative one, but it's not a collaboration platform... at least if your definition of collaboration is more sophisticated than sharing pictures from a boating trip. Wave doesn't compete with SharePoint, it competes with Outlook.

That being said, it has occurred to me recently that one of the weaknesses of SharePoint is its failure to account for the fact that email is and will continue to be the fundamental central connective tissue to all collaborative activies. As you might imagine, Bamboo has one of the most sophisticated, tricked-out SharePoint portals in the world, and yet even here, people continue to exchange documents in email and communicate issues in email that *should* be written into a wiki or discussion board. Why? Convenience. So long as it is more convenient to fire off an email than to upload a document or navigate to a message board, that is what people will do. Wave does address this problem head on, and I think introduces a new paradigm that Outlook will have to adopt, quickly.

But an enterprise collaboration platform? Hardly. There is no sign of document management, content management, workflow, data integration, dashboarding etc. etc. If Google truly believes that Wave is a platform for enterprise collaboration, it only serves as proof that they really don't understand the business. Maybe if they fully integrated Wave, Google Sites, Google Apps, Google Gears, Google Calendar in a comprehensive platform... then you might have something. But Microsoft has a big head start in lashing together all of these disparate capabilities and a huge installed base of customers to drive innovation based on real world feedback.


I sometimes wonder if the "reporters" who send out this kind of information to the world, just lack somekind of insight or that thay deliberately say things that are just not correct. Double check your sources and trust your own knowlegde.

maandag 2 november 2009

Microsoft's FAST and sharepoint integration (SharePoint 2010)

Stephen Arnold has written up an excellent analysis of the information that was given about the coming release of "Fast Search Server 2010 for SharePoint".

Third, there is a reminder to me that SharePoint is a work in progress. I think someone told me that it is the next operating system from Microsoft. The Fast component will be called Fast Search Server 2010 for SharePoint. Now the story gets interesting. Here’s what’s coming:
He then sums up some aspects of the features:
  • A content processing pipeline.
  • Metadata extraction.
  • Structured data search.
  • Visual search.
  • Advanced linguistics.
  • Best bets.
  • Development platform.
  • Customization.
Microsoft has a lot of work to do while their were no live demo's or example that could show these features in action.

maandag 19 oktober 2009

Tactical choices for a FAST ESP / Sharepoint investment

A smart analysis of possibilities and choices you have when faced with an upgrade or change in requirements regarding your "old" Fast ESP (OEM) environment. The relationship with Sharepoint is an interesting one.

From: http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2009/10/19/reflections-on-sharepoint-and-search/

What can customers in a SharePoint environment do with a Fast ESP legacy system? I know what I would do. I would ask that the Microsoft SharePoint engineers find a certified third party who can hook the Fast ESP system into the SharePoint 10 system once these products become available in November 2009. If these experts cannot do the job within the time and budget limits of the organization, I would get a newer system. I know I would look at high profile modern systems such as Exalead’s, and I would check out relative newcomers like Gaviri. In fact, I would do some proofs of concept and pick the best system for my needs. I know I would not consider the older systems that are on the market; for example, the BASIS technology or the Bayesian systems. I want 64 bit, smart systems, not the pains of the past.

I find it very interesting how Stephen Arnold favours the technology of Exalead over the "old" players on the market like Recommind and Autonomy that have based their "magic" on Bayesion probabilistic pattern-recognition.