Posts tonen met het label enterprise search. Alle posts tonen
Posts tonen met het label enterprise search. Alle posts tonen

vrijdag 18 maart 2011

Microsoft positioneert Sharepoint nu ook als Enterprise search product

Microsoft is bezig met een opmars op het gebied van Enterprise Search en ze gebruiken Sharepoint als vervoermiddel.

Enterprise Search Resource Center | SharePoint 2010
Find overviews, how-to topics, and other resources to help you develop and deploy Enterprise Search solutions in SharePoint Server 2010

Het is bijzonder om te zien dat Sharepoint nu in één adem wordt genoemd met "Enterprise Search". Tot dit moment hebben de zoekoplossingen van Microsoft altijd een aparte plek gehad. Denk aan de Microsoft Search Server, Microsoft FAST Search Server etc. Sharepoint wordt zo echter wel een product dat bijna alles schijnt te zijn:
- CMS
- DMS
- Website
- Portaal
- zoekmachine
- samenwerkomgeving
- en wat nog meer?

bron: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/sharepoint/gg618546.aspx

donderdag 30 september 2010

Zoekfunctie in Sharepoint voldoet niet

Vandaag blijkt uit een bericht op fiercecontentmanagement dat gebruikers niet tevreden zijn met de zoekfuncties in Sharepoint.

Stephen Arnold haalt dit onderzoek aan in zijn weblog "Fierce critisism of Sharepoint".

Ik onderschrijf deze kritiek. Dit is nou juist waarom zowel Google als Autonomy gebruikers van Sharepoint zien als een potentiele klant. Het IDOL-platform én de Google Search Appliance hebben bewezen dat ze betere resultaten kunnen bereiken met het implementeren van een zoekoplossing op Sharepoint.

Sharepoint is (op dit moment) een goede oplossing voor content en (beperkt) document management. De zoekfunctie kan echter beter worden overgelaten aan andere, in search gespecialiseerde, zoekmachines.

donderdag 5 augustus 2010

Zoeken is niet meer alleen zoeken: de definitie van Enterprise Search

Een zeer goed artikel op de site van AIIM getiteld: "What is Enterprise Search".

Search is not just search anymore, and the analyst company Gartner has in recent years been using the term "Information access technology" to include and expand on what they previously called "enterprise search technology". They use the term information access to include a collection of technologies to help you find information, such as;

* enterprise search;
* content classification, categorization and clustering;
* fact and entity extraction;
* taxonomy creation and management;
* information presentation (for example visualization).

This is a useful expansion of the problem set, but we should keep in mind that many of the tools around extraction, classification, and categorization remain supplementary to the essential professional task of organizing information.

Ze hebben een "Information Organization & Access (IOA) Certificate program" opgezet om recht te kunnen doen aan de vele facetten die met zoeken te maken hebben.

In onderstaande afbeelding is de samenhang tussen de verschillende subsystemen die met search te maken hebben, geillustreerd:

Het goed is dat ze het probleem van zoeken en vinden dus niet alleen neerleggen bij zoektechnologie, maar ook het beheer en de kwaliteit van de informatie in de keten betrekken.

In "zoekprojecten" is één de eerste zaken die wij doen, het uitvoeren van een data-analyse waarbij we (naast een hadmatige analyse) de ruwe content indexeren. De uitkomsten van zoekvragen op die ruwe content leveren zeer waardevolle inzichten op de kwaliteit van de data. Kwaliteit van de content is een essentiele factor bij het toegankelijk maken van informatie.

vrijdag 19 maart 2010

What Some people think of Enterprise search...

Is sometimes not what you think they mean.

Read the Article "Google Dominates Enterprise Level Search" (http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2010/03/google-dominates-enterprise-level-search.html).

No... you have not been sleeping for 3 year while Google has penetrated the Enterprise. It is just a wrong use of the words "Enterprise search". The author means "the use of web search from within the enterprise to fullfil a business information need".

Here is my comment on the Article I posted on the site:
Hi,

When I saw the title of this article I was suprised. How can it be that, as an expert on enterprise search, I missed this disruptive news?

On the other hand I thought this must be a Google Sponsored Article because Google is just starting its search business in the enterprise.

Reading the article it came clear that you don't use the concept "Enterprise search" as we search experts do. I will make myself clear.

Enterprise search is all about making the information that is stored in databases, CMS's, DMS's, Fileshares etc. etc. WITHIN the ENTERPRISE accessible for SEARCHin and data discovery. Also see the definition on Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enterprise_search.
Players in this field are for instance Autonomy, Exalead, FAST (Microsoft), Attivio, Coveo and Endeca.
Google is big in internet search but still building its enterprise search proposition and market share. The Google Search Appliance (GSA) lacks some important functional aspects that are need in the enterprise search environment. Yahoo simple doesn't exist in the enterprise domain and neither is Bing.

What you mean in your article is the share that web search engines like Google, Yahoo and Bing have when searching business related information. When someone in a company while doing his or her work, searches for information on the internet, you call that enterprise search.

You should call it business-use of web search engines.

dinsdag 26 januari 2010

To search... or not to search

There is no time like the New Year to rethink everything and take a step back in an attempt to see the proverbial forest from the trees. Often this comes to me in the form of wondering where the words we use come from.

The verb "search" comes through the Old French circare, meaning to "go about, wander, traverse," from the Latin circus or circle - A very fitting description indeed. The term comes to be known in the early fourteenth century and would exactly describe the process of looking for something or someone. An individual actually had to go about and wander around looking for what they sought.

Contrast this with the expectations placed on search engines today. Users expect the engine to know immediately upon asking, often using a query of less than two words, where the exact piece of content is they are looking for. If it does require a bit of wandering or traversing it seems to immediately frustrate the user. The desire is that the document most relevant to them is returned in the top results every time. Very little wandering or going about is expected by the user.

In reality the user is not performing a search but instructing the search engine to do so - yet we say "I am going to search for X." We query but the engine does all the "going about, wandering and traversing." This usage is very telling - the engine and the process of its searching has become an extension of the user. The expectation is that the engine, being a natural extension of themselves, knows their every desire and what they consider important.

In light of this should we should not be surprised at user's constant complaints regarding their search experience. Yet the industry seems to keep churning out more and more algorithms that focus on natural language processing, semantic search and other content focused approaches. Vendors seem to neglect and purchasers of enterprise engines keep pushing back deploying any sort of relevance methods that actually focus on understanding the user and fall for the newest vendor jargon year after year.

In this coming year I do not doubt we will see some very interesting technologies brought to market. They will undoubtedly allow us to find experts, tag results, star them and move them around, share them and socialize them - but will they seek to understand what is relevant to an individual searcher? Search profiles on a individual level do exist in some engines but usually remain fixed and static - ignoring context and behavior altogether.

I am putting in an early request - all I want for Christmas is my enterprise search engine to pay attention to me this year.

maandag 11 januari 2010

IT has not enabled counter terrorisme

The article on The Standard today about IT failing in helping intelligence agencies with discovering relations between pieces of information and “connecting the dots” pretty much amazed me.

As we all (at least us information access professionals) know, the intelligence agencies in the US (and other countries) use search engine software intensively.
The homepage of Autonomy states clearly that the Department of Homeland security uses their Intelligent Data Operating Layer (IDOL). I think it’s safe to presume that the agencies not only use Autonomy software exclusively. Home grown solitions are of course combined with the best of the breed search engines and discovery tools.

Clearly the companies that are implementing the IT solutions have not done their work well or the major search vendors are promising more than they can live up to.

From experience I know that a top search engine can be made useless because of a bad implementation. On the other hand I must say that the vendors almost always paint an over simplifide picture when it comes to getting the most out of their software.

 

The field of search and information discovery is a daring one. One thing I hope is that the experiences and insights that are given on past events are being used to find the wholes and causes for not seeing connections in advance. That kind of knowledge can help everyone in building better solutions and information processes that feed the systems.

I know a company that can help intelligence agencies getting the most out of their search and discovery environment ;-)

donderdag 7 januari 2010

Missing vendors in article on Network computing

In the article “Best and worst of times for enterprise search” the author, Paul Korzeniowski, mentions some vendors of enterprise search / eDiscovery solutions.

The list of vendors is missing some very important players though, like Autonomy, Attivio en Microsoft / FAST.

I would advise the author to be more thorough the next time

woensdag 21 oktober 2009

Google GSA gets smart (and smarter automatically)

Google announced some updates for the generation 6 of the GSA. They added a functionality that boosts relevance for documents / terms automatically when the link is clicked in the search results.

From InformationWeek:
Chief among the additions is a new algorithm
called Self-Learning Scorer, which analyzes employee clicks and behavior to
improve the relevance of search results.
If, for example, most employees searching for a given term click on the third search result, the GSA will place that term higher on the search results page for future searches.
On the Internet, Google gets highly relevant search results in part because of its
PageRank algorithm, which analyzes Web links and treats them as votes for
relevance. On corporate intranets, a rich link structure is absent, which makes search relevance harder.
The Self-Learning Scorer system should help compensate for the absence of Web links inside corporate firewalls.
[...]
"In other words, the GSA is moving upstream, while keeping the price low, and continuing to disrupt the confused search market," says Feldman in the report.

Google makes good use of "User Generated Content", in this case the fact that a clicked result is the "proof" of the document being relevant for that particular search.

It is good to see that the difference between internet search and enterprise search is becoming clearer.

woensdag 26 augustus 2009

LexisNexis expanding their services

Beeing driven in a corner...
LexisNexis is forced to search for other ways to keep up revenue. Users want cheeper solutions and are starting to turn to free content that is often published on the web, in stead of paying for it through the subscription services of LexisNexis.

Now LexisNexis offers an integrated search solution that not only searches the LexisNexis content but also has the capability to plug into local sources making it an enterprise search solution.

The new offering integrates Lexis Search Advantage® content and services
accessed through lexis.com with MindServer™ Search, Recommind’s enterprise search
platform. It provides a one-stop destination combining access to documents
and information from both a firm’s internal sources as well as trusted
LexisNexis® content, delivering search results that are more complete, efficient
and actionable.


The search engine is delivered by Recommind.

dinsdag 18 augustus 2009

Book Solr 1.4 Enterprise Search server is finished

Just received a Tweet from lucene_solr stating that the book about implementing the forthcoming Solr 1.4 as an enterprise search server, is finished. The authors expect the shipping to be within 2 weeks.

I pre-ordered the book several weeks ago and now am awaiting the delivery!!!!

Tags van Technorati:

maandag 3 augustus 2009

Fuzz about Google search options

The past few weeks I see so much news and blog articles about the "Search options" that Google has rolled out on their image search application. They added this feature a couple of months ago for there regular websearch to.
They are following the example of Bing who has had this from the start.

I don't see the big news here because "search options" are a standard feature of any enterprise search solution (Autonomy, Solr, Exalead). If you don't have faceted / parametric search the the search solution is useless.

The fact that so many websites see this feature as news has opened my eyes to the fact that so few people are used to real and usable search solutions at work. This strikes me as odd, because how are they able to find the info within their organisation then?

No wonder that the enterprise search / information access market has an estimate share of billions of dollars.

dinsdag 2 juni 2009

Google announces the 6.0 version of the GSA, Search experts are not impressed

Today Google announced the release of the 6.0 version of their Search Appliance
The main improvements are
  • better scalability
    The Box can now hold up to 30 million documents and can be connected to more appliances to hold billions of documents
  • Flexible architecture
    It is easier to connect more appliances
  • Social Search capabilities
    Add page to result.
Some excerpts from other sources:

http://www.itworld.com/software/68712/google-search-appliance-now-can-index-billions-documents

In addition, GSA 6.0 provides end users with social search capabilities, such as the ability for them to add results.

"Google has matured in its thinking about how enterprises implement search," said Rebecca Wettemann, an analyst with Nucleus Research.

Enhancing the Search Appliance in areas like scale, customization and integration will resonate positively in the enterprise market, where Google's main challenge is being perceived primarily as a consumer-focused company, Wettemann said.

While the Search Appliance's functionality isn't still as sophisticated as that of high-end products from Autonomy and Microsoft's Fast Search, it has moved upstream with this latest round of enhancements, said IDC analyst Susan Feldman.

http://www.forbes.com/2009/06/02/google-enterprise-search-technology-cio-network-google.html

Forrester Research analyst Matthew Brown says the product improvements may be as dramatic as Google says they are. But taken in context, Google is still trying to play catch-up to a slew of start-ups and giants like Oracle, he says.

"I'm just kind of unimpressed with what they're announcing," says Brown. "They're coming to market so late, with requirements that were established years and years ago."


donderdag 23 oktober 2008

Guessing About Search Intent

Search Done Right » Blog Archive » Guessing About Search Intent: "An interesting conversation has emerged across the blogs this week regarding how well—or not—enterprise search solutions perform at finding information to the satisfaction of the individual user within the confines of an organization."